Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Important December Deadline Approaching


Get Paid for 2012: Stay Informed of Key Program Deadlines


December 31 deadline 

The reporting year ends on December 31, 2012 for eligible professionals (EPs) participating in the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs in 2012. For participating EPs, this means they must have completed their 90 or 365-day reporting period (within the calendar year) by the end of 2012 in order to receive an incentive payment.


When do I attest?

Medicare EPs must complete attestation for the 2012 program year by February 28, 2013, but can attest as soon as their reporting period is complete.  CMS encourages EPs to register and attest sooner rather than later to resolve any potential issues that may delay their payment. 


Medicaid EPs should check with their State for their attestation deadline.


Resources from CMS

CMS has several resources located on the EHR Incentive Programs website to help EPs properly meet meaningful use and attest, including:


  • A Registration & Attestation page on the CMS EHR Incentive Programs website that houses information on registration and attestation, and includes links to additional resources. 

  • The Meaningful Use Attestation Calculator allows EPs and eligible hospitals to determine if they have met the Stage 1 meaningful use guidelines before they attest in the system. The calculator prints a copy of each EP's or eligible hospital's specific measure summary. 

  • The Attestation User Guide for Medicare Eligible Professionals provides step-by-step guidance for EPs participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program on navigating the attestation system. 

  • The Attestation Worksheet for EPs allows users to enter their meaningful use measure values, creating a quick reference tool to use while attesting.


Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?

Make sure to visit the EHR Incentive Programs website for the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Get Paid for 2012: Stay Informed of Key Program Deadlines


December 31 deadline 

The reporting year ends on December 31, 2012 for eligible professionals (EPs) participating in the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs in 2012. For participating EPs, this means they must have completed their 90 or 365-day reporting period (within the calendar year) by the end of 2012 in order to receive an incentive payment.


When do I attest?

Medicare EPs must complete attestation for the 2012 program year by February 28, 2013, but can attest as soon as their reporting period is complete.  CMS encourages EPs to register and attest sooner rather than later to resolve any potential issues that may delay their payment. 


Medicaid EPs should check with their State for their attestation deadline.


Resources from CMS

CMS has several resources located on the EHR Incentive Programs website to help EPs properly meet meaningful use and attest, including:


  • A Registration & Attestation page on the CMS EHR Incentive Programs website that houses information on registration and attestation, and includes links to additional resources.

  • The Meaningful Use Attestation Calculator allows EPs and eligible hospitals to determine if they have met the Stage 1 meaningful use guidelines before they attest in the system. The calculator prints a copy of each EP's or eligible hospital's specific measure summary.

  • The Attestation User Guide for Medicare Eligible Professionals provides step-by-step guidance for EPs participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program on navigating the attestation system.

  • The Attestation Worksheet for EPs allows users to enter their meaningful use measure values, creating a quick reference tool to use while attesting.


Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?

Make sure to visit the EHR Incentive Programs website for the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.

Thursday, December 6, 2012

Where to Find ICD-10 Information


On October 1, 2014, you and your practice will be required to switch from the familiar ICD-9 code set to more detailed ICD-10 codes. While ICD-10 contains many more codes, your practice will continue to use only codes that are relevant to the patients you treat. 


Think about your office today – you have been using the same ICD-9 codes for years and have probably memorized the ones you work with most frequently. To prepare for the new code set:


  • Identify the diagnoses you most frequently code.

  • Use an ICD-10 code book or software tool to look up these diagnoses and review the potential new codes for the best match.

  • Understand how your clinicians communicate with your coding/billing colleagues: What words do they use to describe their routine protocols to coders/billers?

  • Identify how your practice will enter key words, medical notes, and content in medical records so the protocols are clearly communicated.

  • Discuss changes that may occur in clinical documentation to support ICD-10 code selection.

  • As you begin testing ICD-10 in the coming year, share your ICD-10 code interpretation and selections with your colleagues to minimize the learning curve and avoid miscommunications.


You may notice multiple ICD-10 codes for a given ICD-9 code. The ICD-10 code structure accommodates more information than the ICD-9 structure, for added detail. The result is a more complete picture of complex medical conditions that your clinical documentation will need to capture. 


To take advantage of the power of ICD-10, your practice will need to:


  • Look at how ICD-10 codes differ from ICD-9 codes for your most common diagnoses.

  • Identify what additional documentation or descriptive language clinicians might need to include to ensure selection of the correct ICD-10 code.


Keep Up to Date on ICD-10

Visit the CMS ICD-10 website for the latest news and resources to help you prepare.

For practical transition tips:


Access the ICD-10 continuing medical education modulesdeveloped by CMS in partnership with Medscape

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

CMS and ONC Release New EHR Regulation Affecting Hospitals


Review the Changes to the EHR Incentive Programs for Hospitals Included in New Interim Final Rule with Comment


CMS and ONC have released an Interim Final Rule with Comment (IFC) that makes several changes to the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs and 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria that will affect hospitals. The rule also provides notice of CMS's intention to issue technical corrections to the electronic specifications for clinical quality measures (CQMs) released on October 25, 2012.

The IFC's major changes include:


  • Revising the regulation text for the hospital measures for the objective of making patient information available online. The measure will now base the denominator not on all patients, but all unique patients.



  • Expanding the denominator options for the objective of sending electronic lab results to ambulatory providers. It now allows hospitals to choose between a denominator of all lab orders received from ambulatory providers or all lab orders received electronically from ambulatory providers.



  • Moving the CQM minimum denominator threshold effective date from 2014 to 2013, so hospitals can begin taking advantage of this flexibility right away.


More information about the comment period will be included in an upcoming listserv.

 

Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?

Make sure to visit the EHR Incentive Programs website for the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Medicaid managed care plan leaders do not consistently use quality metrics to address disparities


According to findings reported in “The Role of Data in Health Care Disparities in Medicaid Managed Care,” published in Volume 2, Issue 4 of the Medicare & Medicaid Research Review, leaders at Medicaid managed care plans in California do not routinely use quality metrics, such as HEDIS, to assess disparities despite having access to data on beneficiary race and ethnicity. While leaders described efforts to improve overall quality as driven by standardized metrics, this did not hold for efforts to reduce disparities. Data were frequently only examined by race and ethnicity when overall performance on a measure was low. Disparities were attributed to either individual choices or to cultural and linguistic factors, with plans focusing interventions on recently immigrated groups, despite trends in HEDIS measures that often did not support this focus.

Read the full article:


Citation:

Moskowitz, D., Guthrie, B., & Bindman, A. B. (2012). The Role of Data in Health Care Disparities in Medicaid Managed Care. Medicare Care & Medicaid Research Review, 2(4), E1–E15. 

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

New FAQs on Stage 2 Meaningful Use Measure


Read Our Two New FAQs Providing Information on the Stage 2 Meaningful Use Transitions of Care Measure


CMS and ONC have jointly released two new FAQs that help explain requirements for the transitions of care measure for Stage 2 meaningful use. The measure's objective is: 

The eligible professional (EP), eligible hospital, or critical access hospital (CAH) who transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care should provide summary care record for each transition of care or referral..


New FAQs

The FAQs focus on the certification criteria for this measure, as well as more detailed information about the objective. The questions are:


  • What certification approaches would satisfy the 2014 Edition transitions of care certification criteria adopted at 45 CFR 170.314(b)(1) and (b)(2) as well as permit an eligible provider to have EHR technology that meets the Certified EHR Technology (CEHRT) definition? Please emphasize how the adopted transport standards fit in. Read the answer here.

  • For meaningful use Stage 2's transitions of care and referrals objective, in what ways can I meet the second measure that requires more than 10% of the summary care records I provide for transitions of care and referrals to be electronically transmitted? Read the answer here.


Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?

Make sure to visit the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs websitefor the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Updates to CMS FAQ System


Learn How to Directly Link to FAQs with the Updated System


The updated FAQ system allows users to share direct links to specific questions and answers in the frequently asked questions (FAQs) section.


Locating FAQs

There are a few different ways to find the FAQ you need. To browse by topic, click “ Electronic Health Records Incentive Programs” on the FAQ page’s blue navigation panel. If you would prefer to search by keyword, enter terms into the Search box in the upper left hand corner.

The Search box also allows users to perform searches by FAQ number. FAQs are still searchable by using its old FAQ number, which is listed after the word “Keywords” below the answer of the FAQ, or by using its new FAQ number, which can be found at the very bottom of the FAQ in parentheses.



When searching by new FAQ number, be sure to select the “FAQ #” option by clicking the circle and highlighting it in blue. Please note that you cannot search by old FAQ number in the “FAQ # Search” box. Instead, search by old FAQ numbers in the “Text Search” box.


Sharing FAQs

Once you have located your desired FAQ, a unique link to the web page will be displayed in the address bar. Using this link, you can go directly to the FAQ. For example, if you want to share the FAQ on How and when will incentive payments for the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs be made?, you can use the hyperlink to share and direct yourself to the FAQ again in the future. 

Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?



Make sure to visit the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs website for the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

October 3: Important Deadline for Medicare EHR Incentive Program EPs


October 3 is the Last Day for EPs to begin 90-day reporting period for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program


Wednesday, October 3rd marks two important deadlines for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program:


  1. The last day for eligible professionals (EPs) to begin their 90-day reporting period for calendar year (CY) 2012 for the Medicare EHR Incentive Program. For EPs, this means that they must begin their consecutive 90-day reporting period by October 3rd in order to attest to meeting meaningful use and be eligible to receive an incentive payment for CY 2012. 

  2. The last day Medicare EPs can start participating and receive their maximum possible Medicare incentive payment. This is the last year that EPs can begin participation in the EHR Incentive Program and get the full Medicare incentives of $44,000 per EP. If first-year Medicare EPs have not started their 90-day reporting period by October 3rd, they will not be eligible for a CY 2012 payment, and can only receive $39,000 in Medicare incentives if they successfully participate in 2013.  


For more information on how incentive payments are distributed, take a look at the EHR Basics page of the newly updated EHR website. For EPs who have already completed their reporting period, CMS has a number of tools available to help prepare for attestation, including the Meaningful Use Attestation Calculator and Attestation User Guide for Eligible Professionals. 


CMS encourages EPs not to miss the opportunity to participate in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program this year and receive the maximum incentive payment.


Looking Ahead

Take a look at all of the other EHR Incentive Program important dates that are coming up by going to our Health Information Technology Timeline.

Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?



Make sure to visit the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs websitefor the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Doing Nothing About CVD Will Cost $47 Trillion


September 17, 2012 (Geneva, Switzerland) — One year after a United Nations (UN) High-Level Meeting on Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) that set a target of reducing premature mortality by 25% by the year 2025, the major cardiovascular societies across the globe have come together to publicize the important steps that now need to be taken to achieve this goal, given that CVD accounts for nearly half of all NCD deaths [1].

"What was agreed upon a year ago was a major step forward. This is a coming together, a coalescence--at least between the societies and foundations worldwide--looking at how we can work together and with the World Health Organization [WHO] to move beyond the 25% target, to see how we can actually get there," president of the World Heart FederationDr Sidney Smith (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill), told heartwire in an interview. "We are putting some teeth into the jaws of what can happen," says Smith, who is lead author of a new paper outlining the main objectives in the fight to prevent deaths from heart disease and stroke, published simultaneously today in a number of journals, including Circulation, the European Heart Journal, the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, and Global Heart.

Doing nothing is going to cost the world $47 trillion in the next 25 years, including $500 billion a year in low- and middle-income countries, where 80% of deaths from CVD now occur.

"This statement reflects the desires of the leaders from the major CVD societies to say, 'We are on board, and these are the measures we think can really make a difference,' " he says.

And Smith notes that detailing how much it will cost countries if they fail to act on CVD prevention and treatment is vital. "Doing nothing is going to cost the world $47 trillion in the next 25 years, including $500 billion a year in low- and middle-income countries, where 80% of deaths from CVD now occur," Smith observes. In contrast, estimates by the WHO of how much it will cost to implement various measures they have recommended vary between just $11 billion and $13 billion a year, he says.

Look at "Best-Buy" Targets as a Menu; Effective Surveillance Is Key

The WHO has now identified a core set of 10 low-cost strategies called "best buys" to address NCDs, including, for example, a 25% relative reduction in prevalence of hypertension, 30% relative reduction in mean population intake of salt, and a 30% relative reduction in prevalence of tobacco smoking.

It's important to have all the best buys, but it's not necessary for each country to do all of them.

"But we have to balance several considerations," Smith notes. "The more people have to do, the less likely it is they are going to get everything done. It's important to have all the best buys, but it's not necessary for each country to do all of them. Let's have each country decide on specific areas," he says, although he urges that this still requires treading carefully. "If you eliminate targets on obesity, for example, do you send the wrong message?

"We have to look at the targets as a menu, and every country around the world will have to ask, 'What are the big problems in our country?' If you go to China, it's hypertension, sodium, and smoking. If we are going to choose three where we invest our money, let's choose the ones that are most appropriate."

It will also be important that any outcomes from the actions chosen can be effectively measured, he says. "Many countries just don't have the data, so getting good surveillance in place is critical."

Getting Everyone Involved Is Imperative

Also vital is the involvement of the right personnel in each place, he says, including physicians, who need to become more politically active to help achieve these aims. "And it's important to note that almost everywhere there have been successes, there has been a committed government leader. But it's not going to be just a minister of health you need to engage, it is agriculture and finance too," he observes.

Smith goes on to give one simple example of how revenue could be generated to achieve the aims laid out, citing a calculation made by Bill Gates [2]. "If we were to tax cigarettes 10¢ per pack in developed nations, 6¢ per pack in middle-income nations, and 2¢ per pack in those with a lower income, it would result in $10.8 billion a year that could be used to save millions of lives."

We do have a chance, and one that we cannot afford to miss. This is an epidemic that need not happen.

And lessons can be learned from other campaigns too, he notes--for example, with regard to availability of medications. "Statins are generic, aspirin is inexpensive, and there are cheap medicines for high blood pressure. In the same way we started talking about the ways we could get medications for HIV/AIDS available, let's do it for somebody who's had a stroke or heart attack or somebody who's at very high risk, and that ought to be a focus if we are really going to get a 25% reduction [in mortality] by 2025."

CVD is striking down people in their prime in developing nations, "in their 40s and 50s, people with jobs and families, resulting in crippling blows for countries that are trying to advance," Smith stresses. "With the UN behind this, reporting from every country in the world, we do have a chance, and one that we cannot afford to miss. This is an epidemic that need not happen."

Thursday, September 13, 2012

HHS Celebrates Meaningful Use Day


New CMS/ONC Blog Post Celebrates Meaningful Use Day of National Health IT Week; Discusses Importance of Meaningful Use 


This week, September 10 – 14, is the seventh annual National Health Information Technology Week, a collaborative forum where industry leaders come together to discuss health IT and the pivotal role it can play in transforming the nation's health care system. From consumer engagement to privacy and security, each day of Health IT Week focuses on a specific theme.

 

Tuesday, September 11th was designated as Meaningful Use Day and highlighted the potential of EHRs—used in a meaningful way—to contribute to more coordinated, efficient, and effective health care. 

 

Robert Tagalicod, Director, Office of E-Health Standards and Services, CMS, Mat Kendall, Director, Office of Provider Adoption Support, ONC, and Dr. Farzad Mostashari, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, co-authored a blog post, Now is the Time for Meaningful Use, discussing the importance of meaningful use and the successes of the EHR Incentive Programs to date.

 

On August 23, 2012, CMS issued the final rule for Stage 2 of meaningful use for the EHR Incentive Programs, which builds upon the initial progress of the incentive programs, while introducing new criteria that are designed to improve patient safety and quality of care. Some of the most significant changes in Stage 2 focus on patient engagement and health information exchange.

 

Meaningful use improves patient care, increases care coordination, and empowers patients to become active partners in their health and health care. 

 

Find out more about the changes in the Stage 2 rule on the Stage 2 page of the EHR website.


Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?

Make sure to visit the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs website for the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Join the CMS National Provider Call on September 13


Register for the September 13 CMS National Provider Call on Stage 2


On August 23, 2012, CMS issued the final rule for Stage 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs, which builds upon the initial progress of the Incentive Programs, while introducing new criteria that are designed to improve patient safety and quality of care.

 

On Thursday, September 13, 2012, from 2:00 – 3:00 PM ET, CMS will host a National Provider Call on the final rule of Stage 2 to help providers learn about the new program criteria and successfully receive their incentive payment.


Agenda

The call will cover:


  • The extension to Stage 1 of meaningful use

  • Changes to Stage 1 criteria for meaningful use

  • Proposed Medicaid policies

  • Stage 2 meaningful use overview

  • Stage 2 clinical quality measures (CQMs)

  • Medicare payment adjustments and exceptions

  • Questions and answers about the EHR Incentive Programs


Registration: 

To register for this call, visit the CMS Upcoming National Provider Calls webpage.

Registration closes at 12:00 p.m. ET on the day of the call, or when available space has been filled.

Presentation: 



A link to the slide presentation will be available on the CMS National Provider Calls and Events page.

Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?


Make sure to visit the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs websitefor the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.



Friday, September 7, 2012

Obama Vows to Defend Traditional Medicare, Briefly Touts ACA


September 7, 2012 — President Barack Obama asked for 4 more years to revive the nation's economy in his acceptance speech last night at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, and took his time getting to the subject of healthcare, the most divisive issue of his presidency.

However, once he arrived at that subject, more than halfway into his remarks, Obama drew some lines in the sand.

Obama said he refused to "eliminate health insurance for millions of Americans who are poor, elderly, or disabled...all so those with the most can pay less." This was an oblique and solitary reference to Medicaid, which serves the poor, elderly, and disabled, and which Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney wants to convert into a block-grant program to limit federal outlays.

Obama was even more defiant when it came to Medicare, vowing never to turn it into a "voucher," his way of describing Romney's plan to give seniors a fixed amount of money to purchase either traditional Medicare coverage or a private health plan.

"No American should ever have to spend their golden years at the mercy of insurance companies," Obama told convention delegates. "They should retire with the care and dignity they have earned. Yes, we will reform and strengthen Medicare for the long haul, but we'll do it by reducing the cost of healthcare — not by asking seniors to pay thousands of dollars more."

And the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the president's healthcare reform legislation that survived a Supreme Court challenge? Obama did not mention the law by name, but coyly referred to it twice. Characterizing the Republican preference for small government as an excuse for government inaction, he said, "If you can't afford health insurance, hope you don't get sick."

Later, he told the Democratic faithful that they were "the reason there's a little girl with a heart disorder in Phoenix who'll get the surgery she needs because an insurance company can't limit her coverage." Obama seemed to be touting the ACA provision that prevents insurance companies from denying coverage to children younger than 19 years because of a preexisting condition.

Obama referred to healthcare a final time in a defense of abortion rights when he decried "Washington politicians who want to...control healthcare choices that women should make for themselves."

By the end of the evening, Obama had discussed healthcare in more detail than his Republican opponent had done last week at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida. However, as last night's speech demonstrated, Obama knows that the election on November 6 hinges mostly on whoever can best play the economy card. Obama uttered the word "job" or "jobs" 17 times, a considerable number, but 10 short of Romney's 27 references. Obama said his policies would translate into 1 million new manufacturing jobs during the next 4 years on top of the 500,000 already created in the last 2.5 years.

Voters Seem to Tolerate Healthcare Reform

If Obama downplayed the ACA in Charlotte, one reason may be that more Americans hold an unfavorable opinion of the law than a favorable one. That pattern has generally held true since the ACA was enacted in March 2010, according to monthly tracking polls by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). In August, for example, 43% of Americans said they disliked the law, 38% liked it, and 19% were undecided or refused to comment. However, most Americans favor major provisions of the law on a stand-alone basis, such as free preventive care, health insurance exchanges, and premium subsidies, according to KFF.

The Supreme Court decision in June that preserved the ACA did not shift the survey numbers in any major way. After all, the ruling had something for ACA supporters and opponents alike. The high court said that the law's individual mandate violated the Constitution's Commerce clause, but that it was ultimately justified under the constitutional authority of Congress to levy taxes. Republicans who parsed the opinion could still argue, therefore, that the law had an unconstitutional odor. Likewise, the Supreme Court let a massive expansion of Medicaid proceed, but the court gave states the right to opt out of it.

Those reproofs aside, the law is still on the books, and the public seems resigned to letting it stay there. In July, 58% of Americans said that ACA opponents should stop trying to block the law and move on to other national problems, according to KFF. Only 37% supported further efforts to derail the ACA's implementation.

Another question posed by KFF has uncovered an odd kind of political support for the law: Each month since January 2011, KFF has asked Americans whether Congress should expand the law, keep it as is, replace it with a Republican alternative, or simply repeal it with no substitute. In August, the percentage of Americans who wanted to either maintain or expand the law stood at 49% compared with 40% who wanted to junk the law, with or without a replacement. The ACA has enjoyed this edge, by and large, since KFF started asking the question. So although the law is not popular with most Americans, only a minority actually seeks its demise.

This tolerance of healthcare reform may indeed be more evidence that voters have their minds on economic security, and which candidate can create the most jobs in the next 4 years.

Friday, August 31, 2012

Find Out What is Different Between Stage 1 and 2 of Meaningful Use


New Comparison Tables Highlight the Differences Between the Two Stages of Meaningful Use


On August 23, 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published the final rule for Stage 2 of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs. The rule provides new criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals (CAHs) must meet to successfully participate in the EHR Incentive Programs.


Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Tables

CMS created Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Tables to help providers navigate the next Stage of meaningful use. There is a table for both EPs and for eligible hospitals and CAHs, and each compares the Stage 1 and Stage 2 core and menu objectives. Providers will be able to see which measures are new, which ones are changing, and which ones are being removed. The tables can be found online in the Stage 2 section of the CMS EHR Incentive Programs website.

Snapshot of the Comparison Tables



The table below is a small snapshot of the EP comparison table that is available online. Visit the Stage 2 section of the website to view the complete tables.























Stage 1 ObjectiveStage 1 MeasureStage 2 ObjectiveStage 2 Measure
Implement drug-drug and  drug-allergy interaction checksThe EP has enabled this functionality for the entire EHR reporting periodNo longer a separate objective for Stage 2This measure is incorporated into the Stage 2 Clinical Decision Support measure
Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)More than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using certified EHR technologyGenerate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)More than 50% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are compared to at least one drug formulary and transmitted electronically using Certified EHR Technology


Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?

Make sure to visit the EHR Incentive Programs website for the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.



CMS Publishes EHR Payment Adjustment & Hardship Exceptions Tipsheets


New CMS Resource Available: Payment Adjustment & Hardship Exceptions Tipsheets for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals


CMS has developed new tipsheets to help providers learn more about congressionally mandated payment adjustments that will be applied to Medicare eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals (CAHs) that do not demonstrate meaningful use of certified electronic health record (EHR) technology under the EHR Incentive Programs. Click here to download the tipsheet for EPs and here for the tipsheet for eligible hospitals and CAHs.Key takeaways from the tipsheets include:



Medicare EPs



  • Payment Adjustment Amount: 1% per year, cumulative for every year that an EP is not a meaningful user. The maximum cumulative payment adjustment is 5%.

  • Timing:Payment adjustments begin on January 1, 2015.


Medicare Subsection (d) Eligible Hospitals


  • Payment Adjustment Amount:Applicable to the percentage increase to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) rate. Hospitals that do not demonstrate meaningful use will receive a lower payment than the IPPS standard amount. The payment adjustment is cumulative for each year that a Medicare Subsection (d) eligible hospital does not demonstrate meaningful use.

  • Timing: Payment adjustments begin on October 1, 2014.


Critical Access Hospitals


  • Payment Adjustment Amount: This payment adjustment for CAHs applies to their Medicare reimbursement for inpatient services during the cost reporting period in which they did not demonstrate meaningful use. If a CAH has not demonstrated meaningful use, its reimbursement would be reduced from 101% of its reasonable costs to 100.66%.

  • Timing:Payment adjustments will begin with the fiscal year 2015 cost reporting period.


Hardship Exceptions

Hardship exceptions will be granted to EPs, eligible hospitals and CAHs only under specific circumstances. Providers must demonstrate to CMS that those circumstances pose a significant barrier to achieving meaningful use. Information on how to apply for a hardship exception will be posted on the CMS EHR Incentive Programs website in the future.

Want more information about the new payment adjustments?


Make sure to visit the EHR Incentive Programs website for the latest news and tables detailing payment adjustments.



Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Changes in the Stage 2 Rule: What Medicaid Providers Need to Know


Find out How the Stage 2 Rule Affects Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Participants


On August 23, 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published the final rule for Stage 2 of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs. The rule provides new criteria that eligible professionals (EPs) and eligible hospitals must meet in order to successfully participate in the EHR Incentive Programs.



Included in the Stage 2 final rule are important changes to the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program, including the determination of patient volume calculations. Importantly, the changes to Medicaid patient volume calculations are applicable to eligible providers regardless of which stage of the EHR Incentive Program they are participating in. It is important for Medicaid providers that they understand these changes and how they affect their participation in the program.

 


Click on the links below for information about:

 

Medicaid changes to patient volume calculations 



Q: The Stage 1 Rule stated that, in order for a Medicaid encounter to count towards the patient volume of an eligible provider, Medicaid had to either pay for all or part of the service, or pay all or part of the premium, deductible or coinsurance for that encounter. The Stage 2 Rule now states that the Medicaid encounter can be counted towards patient volume if the patient is enrolled in the state's Medicaid program (either through the state's fee-for-service programs or the state's Medicaid managed care programs) at the time of service without the requirement of Medicaid payment liability. How will this change affect patient volume calculations for Medicaid eligible providers?

 


A: Billable services provided by an eligible provider to a patient enrolled in Medicaid would count toward meeting the minimum Medicaid patient volume threshold, regardless of Medicaid's payment liability for the services, and irrespective of whether the provider is in Stage 1 or Stage 2 of the incentive program.  Read the rest of the answer here.  

 

CHIP patients eligible to be included in Medicaid patient volume totals



Q: The Stage 2 Rule describes changes to how a state considers CHIP patients in the Medicaid patient volume total when determining provider eligibility. Patients in which kinds of CHIP programs are now appropriate to be considered in the Medicaid patient volume total?

 


A: States that have offered CHIP as part of a Medicaid expansion under Title 19 or Title 21 can include those patients in their provider's Medicaid patient volume calculation as there is cost liability to the Medicaid program in either case (in Stage 1, only CHIP programs created under a Medicaid expansion via Title 19 were eligible). This change to the patient volume calculation is applicable to all eligible providers, regardless of the stage of the incentive program they are participating in. Read the rest of the answer here.  

 

Changes to the base year of the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program for hospital incentive payment calculation 



Q: Are there any changes to the base year for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program hospital incentive payment calculation?

 




A: Yes, but depending on when a hospital starts participating in the incentive program. Under the Stage 1 Rule, all Medicaid eligible hospitals calculated the base year using a 12-month period ending in the Federal fiscal year before the hospital's fiscal year that serves as the first payment year. But as described in the Stage 2 rule, hospitals that begin participating in the incentive program in program year 2013 or later will use the most recent continuous 12‑month period for which data are available prior to the payment year.  Read the rest of the answer here.

 


To find out more information about the Stage 2 final rule, visit the Stage 2 section of the EHR website.

 

Want more information about the EHR Incentive Programs?

Make sure to visit the EHR Incentive Programs website for the latest news and updates on the EHR Incentive Programs.