Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Tewksbury Hospital in Massachusetts terminates worker after long-term snooping

A worker at Tewksbury Hospital in Massachusetts was discovered to be occasionally snooping in sufferers’ electronic medical records without clinical justification.

The inappropriate access of medical records occurred from the year of 2003 until it was discovered this past spring. Now, the facility—one of four hospitals in the Massachusetts Department of Public Health serving complex chronically ill adult sufferers and psychiatric patients—has notified more than 1,100 affected people.

Tewksbury Hospital officials say they learned of the breach in April, when a former patient expressed concern that their medical record might have been inappropriately accessed. Compromised data involved names, addresses, and dates of birth, gender, diagnoses and medical treatments. Less than half of the records involved viewing of Social Security numbers, according to the hospital.

The state’s department of health has terminated the worker.

“To decrease the chance of future tragedies like this occurring, we are reviewing our policies regarding access to the electronic medical records system,” Tewksbury executives noted in a statement. “We’re also reassessing how we review our workforce members’ use of the electronic medical records system and will be reviewing the training we provide to all workforce members regarding the privacy and security of confidential information.”

Tewksbury Hospital is advising affected people to notify credit reporting agencies, order a credit report and review it for signs of fraud, and request a security freeze to prevent the opening of new accounts using the compromised information.

In its notification to sufferers, Tewksbury Hospital is not offering credit monitoring or identity theft protection services. Currently, there is no indication that information has been accessed or misused, in accordance with a spokesperson for the hospital.

The hospital refused to give additional details about the incident, and did not comment on why the inappropriate access had gone undetected for fourteen years.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment